So when I created the original PMP website, the term "post-modern pulp" was just sort of rattling around in my head as a catch-all phrase that helped me classify this massive swath of fiction that I had come to find myself dipping into time and time again, from adolescence through adulthood.  Eventually, when the website went up, I decided I needed to define just what it was I was talking about.
So, Here is the text from the original PMP page...
Most people out there have heard the term "pulp  fiction" at one time or another, and at least a modest number associate  the term with something other than Tarantino's film.  While it's a  tradition that goes back a long while, and various experts will date the  emergence of "pulp literature" to various points in time, the most  common benchmark is the booming explosion of rowdy, violent, sexy, and  above all adventuresome short fiction in the 1920's that lasted up until  around WW 2.
This is not to say that pulp died out in  the 40's, but it is mostly considered a hallmark of the period between  the two world wars.  After the war its notoriety waned a little, and with the  expansion of television and the growth of the comics industry, the pulp  era for the most part found itself lingering on quietly in the  background, far less popular than the comic books that supplanted it as  the primary form of written "cheap thrills" entertainment.
Thus remained the status quo for a couple of decades.  However, starting  around the mid- to late-60's, and really taking off in the 1970's,  there was a "renaissance" (if you will) of pulp fiction writing that  lasted up into the mid- (and possibly late-) 80's.  This movement had, I  feel, two main foci; the re-birth of interest in the heroic fantasy  (also called "Sword & Sorcery") genre, and the reinvention of "men's  adventure fiction" as it was often called at the time.  This is the era  of what I like to call the "post-modern pulps".
Defining just why this resurgence came  about is a slippery slope of conjecture and generalization, but I'd like  to offer up a couple of theories.  The first is that a lot of the  people who grew up around the end of the first pulp era, those who were  born in the mid-20's and were perhaps too young to go off to WW2, found  themselves waxing sentimental in their comfortable adulthood and decided  to try their hands at writing the sort of wild, adventurous pulp that  they loved so much in their youth.  certainly during the 60's and 70's a  lot of the pulp Sword & Sorcery fiction was re-printed, and while  I'm sure the "discovery" of Tolkien during that period had great effect,  many of the fantasy authors who wrote during this new pulp era openly  admired and wished to emulate authors like Tolkien, Robert E. Howard,  Fritz Lieber, and the like.
On top of this, however, and perhaps the more defining characteristic,  was the social unrest of the times.  Vietnam, race riots, the women's  liberation movement, the gas crisis, and the general feelings of uncertainty and  chaos did a lot to crack open the deeper parts of our collective human  psyche, and a much darker, more violent, more ruthless part of human  nature bubbled up to the surface.  As can be seen in the film industry  of the period, things became a lot more gritty, a lot more vivid, and a  lot less optimistic.  Horror films like Night of the Living Dead  and The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, vigilante crime movies like Death  Wish and Dirty Harry, and orgiastic indulgences like Beyond  the Valley of the Dolls displayed a social consciousness filled  with sex, drugs, death, and an eerie sense of nihilism.  Oh yeah, it  also didn't help that  a million megatons of atomic destruction was  sitting under the trigger fingers of the two world superpowers, and no  one knew if at any moment someone would call the cards and light up the  world like a nuclear Christmas tree.
Under this cloud of turmoil and unrest, the  post-modern pulp movement was born.  Cheap little paperback novels, most  falling into the 150-250 page range (thin enough to actually be "pocket  paperbacks" as opposed to the 500 to 900-page behemoths found these  days), published with garish, almost offensive cover art and bearing  absolutely ridiculous, almost laughable series and issue titles.  Most  of these fell in the $1.50 to $4.50 price range, and were published by  companies that specialized in churning out this sort of cheap, livid  entertainment on a very regular basis; some of these authors would  release several volumes a year, and some of the titles would have more  than one author working under a single series pseudonym, meaning the  titles could sometimes be published as often as bi-monthly.
As I pick up and read more and more of these books, either through the  'Net or by digging through used book stores, I have quickly found that  not too many of these series have any serious internet presence.  No one  reviews them or talks about reading them - most of the references to a  lot of these books come from bare-bones listings of certain writer's  published works.  Therefore, I decided to put up a website dedicated to  reviewing some of these books.  I'm no expert or authority on the  subject, but I actually feel a little too much literary authority would  really detract from the sort of focus these books have; they're cheap  thrills, high-octane entertainment.  This isn't "literature" the way  your stuffy college profs view literature, this is pulp, and if  one doesn't "get it", they'll never read beyond page 3 of anything on  this website.
Monday, June 28, 2010
Saturday, June 26, 2010
Oh Yeah, That Just Happened
Yes, it has been almost three years.
And I'm sure no one actually reads this blog; I've got 110 followers right now over at Tankards & Broadswords, but this blog has been largely ignored as my interests in blogging shifted from post-modern pulp fiction to role-playing games and miniatures war-gaming.
However, I still have my collection of post-modern pulps, and I keep meaning to work on this blog - spruce it up (which I just did), and especially post a bunch of the material I had up on the original postmodernpulps.org website. I had a bunch of reviews of different series as well as reviews of individual novels. Sooner or later, I'll have to get all that up here.
Anyhow, last night I received an interesting e-mail. I don't want to give away too many details, but here's a hint:
http://www.thedeathmerchant.com/
Oh yeah...this is going to be good.
More to come, pulp lovers. Get your AMT Automags out, load up, and smoke 'em if you got 'em.
And I'm sure no one actually reads this blog; I've got 110 followers right now over at Tankards & Broadswords, but this blog has been largely ignored as my interests in blogging shifted from post-modern pulp fiction to role-playing games and miniatures war-gaming.
However, I still have my collection of post-modern pulps, and I keep meaning to work on this blog - spruce it up (which I just did), and especially post a bunch of the material I had up on the original postmodernpulps.org website. I had a bunch of reviews of different series as well as reviews of individual novels. Sooner or later, I'll have to get all that up here.
Anyhow, last night I received an interesting e-mail. I don't want to give away too many details, but here's a hint:
http://www.thedeathmerchant.com/
Oh yeah...this is going to be good.
More to come, pulp lovers. Get your AMT Automags out, load up, and smoke 'em if you got 'em.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
 
 
